I say labels. …
I say labels. They’re too broad, self ascribed, and encompass extremes. People can focus on the extremes in either group and will begin to believe that all people who associate with either term fit either extreme. Its absurd to believe that any opinion can be fairly summed up with two possible terms. Its black and white thinking.

Lol I’ve got final …
Lol I’ve got final exams as well next week. good luck!

I admire your …
I admire your enthusiasm, but I am afraid you got me wrong. What I said was “I am not a theist”, not “I am not atheist”. I’m sorry to say that I am a naturalistic pantheist, which is somewhat close to atheism in practice, and thus not a christian. That said, I do read the Bible, as well as the Coran and Homer’s poems.
But it’s good to talk to a fellow believer anyhow, for even though I am not a believer I am still a fellow, and I enjoy the compagny of believers.

Haha you’re not …
Haha you’re not that agnostic are you? Well and why not? I’m not a theist, but I what we call “christian communism” is very close to the anarchist-communist principles I advocate.
Mat 21:12-14, well known, but more interesting:
Act 2:42-45 and Act 4:32-37.

im speaking about …
im speaking about theoretical revenge. like if someone wronged me in a serious way. and what is done about those who do murder rampantly and defy control. the police cant catch everyone right? im not convinced that people have the morals to uphold a society that is without government. its hard to imagine.

i cant stop …
i cant stop cringing. im wondering whats going to happen to the past few american presidents who absolutely butt the economy, the treasury, the constitution, and the people of america. america has been sold out and opened for attack by our mindless presidents. you know things like this reading about my presidents makes me almost look at anarchy with envy because i could just absolutely slaughter and get revenge on anyone that i felt deserved it. mercenary work might be pretty rewarding

nobody should need …
nobody should need a law for that…..at least i would hope nobody would. as far as the defense of anarchy goes, to each his own

I believe that my …
I believe that my country, at its core has un-tamable power. the world needs moral police to kill off the uncivilized (but that makes the protected people weak over time). I used to like anarchical socialism but then I realized it would cut life span in half and would return the world to the social status it was in the nomadic tribe era, until a group of people decided to unite and retry structured civilization. i think people are social by nature. and what about reproduction without incest?

I’m convinced the …
I’m convinced the constitution will still be here when its all said and done. There’s just something about that flag, lady liberty, our history, and that pledge of allegiance. I could tell who the ungrateful and worthless flag burning anti-patriots were from the get go in high school when we were asked to stand for the pledge and some of my classmates just sat there grinning like they knew something we didn’t. I don’t know about you guys but, I’d fight for this country any day of my life.

I do agree, and I …
I do agree, and I wouldn’t even add “in modern days”, but I can’t really tell if it’s different from “conservative” in any subtancial way. For me, America’s “democracy” is nothing but the choice between smallpox and anthrax.

That’s good if …
That’s good if you’re happy with it. I support libertarian socialist, also called anarcho-communism. That is, the abolition of both capitalism and the state, instead of the state-capitalism. That’s the only sure way to get the result you may seek from that balance, according to me.

i dont follow any …
i dont follow any of that guy’s teachings. borders, language, culture for me. i listen to michael savage’s radio broadcasts.