[On the eve of Barack Obama's victory on winning the Democratic nomination] Hillary Clinton told colleagues Tuesday she would be consider joining Barack Obama as his running mate. On a conference call with other New York lawmakers, Clinton, a New York senator, said she was willing to become Obama’s vice presidential nominee…Advisers for Clinton are also indicating that the former first lady is withholding a formal departure from the race partly to use her remaining leverage to press for a spot on the ticket. They said Clinton has made a strategic decision to not formally end her campaign, giving her room to negotiate with Obama on various matters including a possible vice presidential nomination for her.

Clinton’s vice presidential remarks came in response to a question from Democratic Rep. Nydia Velazquez, who said she believed the best way for Obama to win key voting blocs, including Hispanics, would be for him to choose Clinton as his running mate…Clinton said if Obama were to ask her to be on the ticket, she would be interested. “I am open to it,” Clinton replied…Aides to the Illinois senator said he and Clinton had not spoken about the prospects of her joining the ticket.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24953561/
The speech tonight was a remarkable one for a candidate who has lost the nomination, though not remarkable for a Clinton. It was an assertion that she had won the nomination and a refusal to concede anything to her opponent. Classless, graceless, shameless, relentless. Pure Clinton.

Her narcissism requires that she deprive her opponent of a night, or a second, of gratification or attention. And she has now won, in her Bush-like version of reality, 18 million votes. Her invitation for her supporters to email their suggestions to her website is pure theater, a way of keeping herself in the spotlight and maneuvering her delegates to demand a second spot on the ticket. The way she is now doing this - by an implicit threat, backed by McCain, to claim that Obama is an illegitimate nominee if she does not get her way - is designed to humiliate the nominee sufficiently to wound him enough to lose the election.

Either way, she is clearly intent on getting Obama defeated this fall if she is not offered the vice-presidency. And if she gets the veep nod, the way she has gotten it will allow her to argue that a November loss was not her loss. It was his. And she will run again in 2012. She will not go away. The Clintons will never go away. And they will do all they can to cripple any Democrat who tries to replace them. In the tent or out of it, it is always about them. And they are no longer rivals to Obama; they are threats.
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/06/the-clintons-th.html
Lots of Democrats love Hillary Rodham Clinton. Yet plenty of Republicans, conservatives and all-important independents can’t stand her, suggesting possible pitfalls for Barack Obama should he make her his vice presidential running mate. The intense dislike for Clinton suggests that besides support from women and others she could bring to the ticket, she might make it harder for Obama to win over some independents, a pivotal swing group in the November election against Republican John McCain. It also means she might push some Republicans and conservatives to vote against the Democrats — or donate money to the GOP — who might otherwise lack motivation to do so because of tepid feelings toward McCain.

A substantial 32 percent of independents strongly dislike Clinton, 10 points more than they say so about Obama, according to an AP-Yahoo News poll conducted over the last several months. Independents, a group that both Obama and McCain won during their party primaries this year, comprised a quarter of voters in the 2004 election and have been closely contested in every presidential election since 1992. In addition, 67 percent of Republicans have very unfavorable views of Clinton, 24 percentage points more than feel that way about Obama. Among conservatives the spread is similar — 58 percent say they feel very negatively about her, 18 points more than they say so about Obama.

Few conservatives and Republicans are going to vote under any circumstances for Obama, who already has advisers culling possible running mates. But both parties will be trying to discern whether putting Clinton on the ticket might in some ways backfire. “I don’t think I’d like the idea of Hillary Clinton attached to anything,” said Kym Williams, 33, of Knoxville, Tenn., a Republican who’s not decided how to vote in November. “I’m not for a lot of the things she stands for.” Other groups with significantly stronger negative feelings about Clinton than Obama include whites under age 30, male college graduates, white men and whites earning at least $100,000 a year.
http://www.delawareonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080610/NEWS02/806100339/1007

Duration : 0:5:19


[youtube EOVGBlxBJTE]

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

This entry was posted on Friday, November 20th, 2009 at 10:54 pm and is filed under Hillary Clinton. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

25 comments so far

rossmcl177
 1 

Is that a …
Is that a barge-pole I see before me????

November 20th, 2009 at 10:54 pm
ChrisBennettFilmS
 2 

how many people are …
how many people are in this world??

November 20th, 2009 at 10:54 pm
kbean5588
 3 

I was all for …
I was all for Hillary during the primaries because I thought she was the stronger Democrat, but I seriously doubt Clinton could have carried Virginia, North Carolina, or Indiana because of her polarizing effect on people, particularly Republicans, in those states. However, she would have easily carried Ohio, and maybe even Florida. BTW, He won the election by 7.6% points, a near landslide in today’s polarized atmosphere.

November 20th, 2009 at 10:54 pm
LoveAmericaStyle
 4 

Google Jeff Fisher …
Google Jeff Fisher World Peace Trailer
Google Jeff Fisher More Youtubes to ensure World Peace

Pass my posting everywhere and I will have Richard Branson fly all of you to see Madonna perform at Jane’s and mine wedding in London later this year.

This up to the first 200 posters who email me at GodLOvesChristianJeffFisher at gmail

and first 200 posters at ALLAHLOVESJEFFFISHER at gmail

and first 200 posters at GREATSPIRITLOVESJEFFFISHER at gmail

Jeff Fisher Peacemaker Forever

November 20th, 2009 at 10:54 pm
stephanietannerluver
 5 

First of all he won …
First of all he won the popular vote by 5% against John McCain and on CNN they said that Obama got 69 million votes more than any other canidate in history. Second of all it’s not his fault thatAfrican Americans voted against gay marriage, they have minds of they’re own. Thirdly Barack Obama is HALF WHITE and His half sister is Indonesian. He cares about every race and you have a lot of nerve to say he doesn’t!

November 20th, 2009 at 10:54 pm
nrthdude1
 6 

Obama only won the …
Obama only won the popular vote by 3% against McCain. With Hillary it would have been a slam dunk and Hillary has the experience Obama sorely needs.

So far, not so good though. His African-American voters have banned gay marriage and he’s choosing Colin Powell, the man who prevented Bill Clinton from overturning the military ban against gays. So, it looks like Obama and African-Americans feel civil rights are only for racial minorities.

What a bunch of hypocrites and haters.

November 20th, 2009 at 10:54 pm
Kellybarbiedoll
 7 

THE BEST undisputed …
THE BEST undisputed and only ‘OFFICIAL’ OBAMA VICTORY SONG AT THE MOMENT IS “FEELS A LONG JOURNEY”..BY THE AUSTRALIAN ROCK GROUP-”THE MOD SQUAD”…on Youtube..search-BARACK OBAMA “FEELS A LONG JOURNEY”…this song has become a classic in just a few days!! Great Campaign…great song!!

November 20th, 2009 at 10:54 pm
samohtzoo
 8 

they called him …
they called him most everything and implied the rest. they probably hurt him much more than they helped him.after trashing his good name and calling him incompetent they then have to turn around after losing the primary and say no just politics you can vote for him now,they should go home.

November 20th, 2009 at 10:54 pm
nrthdude1
 9 

Don’t be ridiculous …
Don’t be ridiculous.

Obama couldn’t have been more divisive when he refused to choose Hillary Clinton as his Vice President even though she won over 18 million votes - more than and primary candidate in American political history, and certainly more than Obama.

Besides he was helped enormously by the Clintons who did more for him than any defeated rivals in history.

And now he is placing former Clinton Administration staff on his own. At least that’s change we can rely on.

November 20th, 2009 at 10:54 pm
nrthdude1
 10 

It is “Ms.” …
It is “Ms.” whatever a woman’s age is.

Your “spring chicken” remark indicates you’re one of many prejudiced Obama supporters against people over a certain age.

I was appalled by the Obama campaign’s age-ist tactics against Senator McCain.

And his sexist campaign against both Hillary Clinton and Sara Palin.

The majority of Obama supporters voted against gay marriage.

I guess civil rights aren’t for everybody, just African-Americans.

So much for “change.”

November 20th, 2009 at 10:54 pm
firewallx
 11 

Really!? Wow, I’ll …
Really!? Wow, I’ll see you in 2012 yelling smears on TV about *my* president.

November 20th, 2009 at 10:54 pm
firewallx
 12 

First of all, it’s …
First of all, it’s not ‘Ms Clinton,’ it’s MRS. She’s not a spring chicken.

Secondly, Johnson, Bush, and Edwards did not do to their running mates (during the primaries) what MRS. Clinton did to Obama. She was as divisive to the Democratic party w/ her anti-Obama rhetoric as Palin was for the entire country.

November 20th, 2009 at 10:54 pm
usageee
 13 

It would’ve been …
It would’ve been great to see a VP debate between Palin and Hillary.

November 20th, 2009 at 10:54 pm
andyjalc
 14 

She didn’t do much …
She didn’t do much at all to help McCain. McCain lost and now Obama will lead the country. The Clintons aren’t done yet. She could still run again.

November 20th, 2009 at 10:54 pm
user0983
 15 

ACTUALLY, I bet the …
ACTUALLY, I bet the Clintons are laughing their off now that it’s been proven that Sarah Palin did absolutely nothing to attract Hillary voters since, y’know, McCain/Palin lost.

November 20th, 2009 at 10:54 pm
DarkThunderSamurai
 16 

lmao
lmao

November 20th, 2009 at 10:54 pm
Troublesome2008
 17 

Yes you can!
Come …

Yes you can!
Come on America!
Vote Obama!

November 20th, 2009 at 10:54 pm
nrthdude1
 18 

What typifies …
What typifies Obama’s inexperience is his poor winner behavior and not being able to rise above the campaign struggle.

Kennedy brought on Johnson, Reagan brought on Bush, Kerry brought on Edwards.

Obama’s my-way-or-the-highway attitude about everything bodes poorly for diplomatic abilities.

His churlishness towards Ms. Clinton, his sexism towards women, (giving the former First Lady the finger, and calling Sara Palin a pig) are deeply distressing.

He’s out for himself, only.

November 20th, 2009 at 10:54 pm
nrthdude1
 19 

She did win it this …
She did win it this time around.

It was the DNC that pressured the delegates and superdelegates to vote against her when the DNC realized it had picked the wrong candidate.

Hillary won over 18 million votes - more people voted for her than any other candidate in American political history, and more than did for Obama.

If the roles were reversed & she won, she would have unified the party, selected Obama as VP, paid off his debt, reached out to his supporters, brought them on board.

November 20th, 2009 at 10:54 pm
nrthdude1
 20 

Actually, “with all …
Actually, “with all due respect,” Obama is old guard as well, probably more so than Hillary Clinton. He has surrounded himself with ancient windbags like Kennedy, Kerry, Biden, Dean and Pelosi.

Clinton was truly moving forward ready to revitalize the Democrats the way her husband rebuilt the party in the 1990s.

And, she clearly undersottd that Civil Rights are for everyone not just Afican-Americans - even the Republicans understand this.

November 20th, 2009 at 10:54 pm
nrthdude1
 21 

I’ll bet Barack …
I’ll bet Barack Obama wishes he picked Hillary Clinton as VP.

Oh well…

I’ll bet the Clintons are laughing theire off now that Sara Palin has tipped Obama upside down.

November 20th, 2009 at 10:54 pm
DayGlowClams
 22 

If Obama loses, it …
If Obama loses, it might be because he didn’t choose the right VP candidate.

November 20th, 2009 at 10:54 pm
rickrod40
 23 

What we need right …
What we need right now is Hillary as VP!

November 20th, 2009 at 10:54 pm
UncleRico13
 24 

With all do respect …
With all do respect to Hillary Clinton, she’s just not a good fit for Obama. She’s more of the old guard. She’s politically ambitious and wants what’s best for herself. She’s won’t even publicly get behind Obama.

Besides, she’s got 20 million dollars in debt to take care of from her own campaign.

She’s trying to get other people to pay for it, but do you really want someone like that running your country?

November 20th, 2009 at 10:54 pm
MystikWizard
 25 

If Hillary didn’t …
If Hillary didn’t win it this time, what makes you think she is going to win it in 2012 and someone else will emerge the same way Obama did this time? You are very narrow-minded.

November 20th, 2009 at 10:54 pm

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment