There has check out youtube.
References :

Because the winners of the war are never tried for warcrimes. that and it would be next to impossible to prove that he willingly lied tothe public. For every paper that says there are no wmd in iraq you could find 10 that say there are.
References :

People are to lazy and congess members are too scared for their own reputation to do anything.
References :

Because our duly elected representatives in the House and Senate have neither voted on or brought up impeachment charges. Only a few fringe elements have even mentioned this. The thing about that is if your going to hit the Bush administration for Iraq, you have to retoractively hit the Clinton administration for Bosnia. Choose your battles.
References :

Kucinich Writes to Conyers
Submitted by davidswanson on Sat, 2007-11-10 00:53. Congress | Impeachment
November 9, 2007
The Honorable John Conyers, Jr.
Chairman
Committee on the Judiciary
2138 Rayburn HOB
Washington, DC 20515

Dear Chairman Conyers

I am writing in support of H. Res. 799, the Articles of Impeachment which were referred to the committee relative to the Impeachment of the Vice President of the United States of America.

Recent reports indicate that the Vice President is attempting to shape the National Intelligence Estimate on Iran to conform to his misperceptions about the threat Iran actually poses. Much like his deceptive efforts in the lead up to the Iraq war, the Vice President appears to be manipulating intelligence to conform to his beliefs.

If the reports are true, they add additional weight to the case for impeachment. I believe impeachment remains the only tool Congress has to prevent a war in Iran. This information relates directly to the Article III charges in the resolution. I urge your timely consideration.

From the earliest days, as documented below and in subsequent posts, the largest media outlets were almost universally acquiescent in, or oblivious to, administration policy. Dec 21, 2000 through Dec 31, 2000:

Dec. 21, 2000 – A report appears that Adel Jubeir, longtime first secretary at the Saudi Embassy to Ambassador Prince Bandar bin Sultan in Washington, D.C., will return to Saudi Arabia after many years in Washington, to take a senior position in the court advising Crown Prince Abdullah ibn Abdulaziz. The move reflects accurately that Jubeir’s lengthy service on behalf of the Saudi ruling family in the U.S. capital is now superfluous.

Dec. 28, 2000 — Bush nominates Donald H. Rumsfeld to be Secretary of Defense. Rumsfeld had been Secretary of Defense under President Ford, with Cheney as White House Chief of Staff (1975-77); Cheney had been Secretary of Defense under President George H. W. Bush (1989-93). Rumsfeld, a co-founder of PNAC with Cheney, is another signer of the 1998 PNAC letter to Clinton demanding regime change in Iraq. Reportedly a top priority for Bush and Rumsfeld at the outset of the administration is “restructuring the Pentagon,” which in practice entails keeping the U.S. Army off balance.

Dec. 28, 2000 – ExxonMobile agrees to buy a cargo of Iraqi oil through secondary lifters, a move soon followed by all other major oil companies. This little-reported move signals that the market for Iraqi oil is wide open again; Iraqi oil exports, which were down in Dec. 2000, will rebound by spring. The Bush administration does nothing to discourage buying from Iraq: the main market for Iraqi crude oil is the U.S., which buys over 90% of exports between Dec. 2000 and Feb. 2001. (Middle East Economic Survey, Apr. 9, 2001)

Dec. 29, 2000 – The Washington Post runs an editorial, “A Second Tour,” setting the tone for the lenient scrutiny the administration will receive from the Post:

“In the Gerald Ford administration a quarter-century ago, a young former congressman named Donald Rumsfeld was chief of staff, then secretary of defense. His deputy and successor as chief of staff was also a former congressman, Dick Cheney. The deputy director of the Office of Management and Budget was a young budget analyst who had distinguished himself, Paul O’Neill.

With yesterday’s announcement by President-elect George W. Bush that Mr. Rumsfeld will return to the Pentagon job, the three men whose careers have so strikingly paralleled one another’s–each has since been the CEO of a major private corporation–will again be in tandem in government. It is an uncanny reversion to an earlier era. Mr. Cheney, who himself was secretary of defense in the previous Bush administration, was the first to be chosen. Having been entrusted with the process of helping George W. Bush choose a vice president, he became the choice himself. As vice president-elect, he was then instrumental in the naming of Mr. O’Neill to be Treasury secretary, and now Mr. Rumsfeld to serve once again at defense. It is hard to remember a vice president-elect who has been similarly influential.

All three of these men are in many ways comforting choices. They come from the pragmatic rather than ideological wing of their party, are plainly capable and have among them extensive experience both within government and without. They well know the past. The question may be how keen an eye they have for the future. In defense particularly, that is the overarching, daunting issue.”

This generic line that Cheney and Rumsfeld belong to the ‘pragmatic’ rather than to the ‘ideological’ wing of the GOP provides successful cover for administration designs on Iraq. No major media outlets delve thoroughly into Cheney’s background in the petroleum industry, including Cheney’s ‘Borat’ connection, that Cheney served on the Oil Advisory Board for Kazakhstan after being U.S. Secretary of Defense for the Gulf War. Distributing Middle East oil via the Caspian region was a longtime aim of American companies including those with links to the administration.

Dec. 31, 2000 – Another typical benefit of the doubt extended by the Washington Post toward appointees from the Reagan and previous Bush administrations:

“Despite Democratic complaints about Ashcroft and Norton, some critics have been mollified by his Cabinet’s gravitas. Many of Bush’s other nominees, including Donald H. Rumsfeld for secretary of defense, held lofty positions in earlier Republican administrations and seem certain to be treated with deference because of their stature and their deep personal relationships on Capitol Hill.”

(“Bush’s Choices Defy Talk of Conciliation; Cabinet Is Diverse but Not Politically,” front page)
References :
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/28592

http://www.margieburns.com/blog/_archives/2007/11/12/3348599.html

THAT’S THE BEST EVER QUESTION put on Y/A!!!!!!!
References :

It won’t happen because George Bush and Dick Cheney are protecting our country from the terrorists who want to kill you.
References :

Even Nancy Pelosi has a disdain for political suicide.

Why don’t you sit back and wait on the election and try to win that instead of trying to manufacture another pseudo scandal
References :

The initiative to do so (presuming that there is a good case to be made) must come from the Democratic members of Congress. The media circuses of Watergate and OMG the Pres got a BJ did little good (and perhaps even bad) for the party who initiated procedure. Perhaps the Democratic Party is more concerned about the 2008 election and doesn’t want to open themselves to the GOP snarking that would be inevitable in any election year impeachment process.
References :

you must not read any of the postings her. theres been plenty of pap and spam from the pelosi/reid regime supporters.

the catch is
NO IMPEACHABLE BEHAVIORS EXIST
grow up
get a life
get over it
References :